THE PROBLEMS OF INTERACTION BETWEEN PRE-HOSPITAL AND HOSPITAL STAGES WITH SUSPECTED ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME IN REAL LIFE
https://doi.org/10.24884/2072-6716-2018-19-2-21-27
Abstract
The aim of the study was to study the results of treatment in primary vascular center of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The study included 543 patients with suspected ACS, delivered by emergency medical service or who applied consistently for 3 months to the primary vascular center and 10 patients with myocardial infarction, hospitalized initially with other diagnoses. The results of electrocardiographic study, studies of markers of myocardial necrosis, coronary angiography, the proportion of hospitalization, 30-day outcomes and cases of repeated inpatient contact were evaluated. Low diagnostic capabilities of the hospital’s receiving department, which does not have an emergency department, in relation to the risk assessment of the patient with chest pain were revealed. Low possibilities of hospitalization of patients with suspected ACS have been established, which leads to delayed hospitalization and mortality of non-hospitalized patients at home. Errors in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction at the prehospital stage lead to diagnostic errors in the hospital. More frequent use of qualitative evaluation of myocardial necrosis markers at the prehospital stage is suggested as ways of solving the problems.
About the Authors
O. A. ShtegmanRussian Federation
Oleg A. Shtegman
A. A. Kharitonov
Russian Federation
Aleksandr A. Kharitonov
S. A. Skripkin
Russian Federation
S. A. Krekov
Russian Federation
Sergej A. Krekov
References
1. Yeh R.W., Sidney S., Chandra M. et al. Population trends in the incidence and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction // N. Engl. J. Med. 2010. Vol. 362, No 23. P. 2155–2165.
2. Gafarov V., Gafarova A. Programmy VOZ: «Registr Ostrogo Infarkta Miokarda», «MONIKA» — dinamika ostryh serdechno-sosudistyh katastrof v 1977–2009 gg v obshhej populjacii v vozraste 25–64 let v Rossii. Rossijskij kardiologicheskij zhurnal, 2016, Vol. 132, No 4, pp. 129–134 (in Russ.).
3. Garganeeva A. A., Okrugin S. A., Borel’ K.N., Tukish O. V. Prichiny smerti bol’nyh s ostrym infarktom miokarda v neprofil’nyh stacionarah. Klinicheskaja medicina, 2015, No 6, pp. 73–76. (in Russ.).
4. uda M. Ja., Averkov O. V., Panchenko E. P., Javelov I. S. Diagnostika i lechenie bol’nyh c ostrym koronarnym sindromom bez pod#ema segmenta ST jelektrokardiogrammy. Chast’ 1. Kardiologija, 2017, Vol. 57, No 8, pp. 80–100. (in Russ.).
5. Glushanko V. S., Shefiev R. Sh. Organizacija skoroj medicinskoj pomoshhi v SShA. Dostizhenija fundamental’noj, klinicheskoj mediciny i farmacii. Materialy 72-j nauchnoj sessii sotrudnikov universiteta. Vitebskij gosudarstvennyj medicinskij universitet, 2017, pp. 512–513 (in Russ.).
6. Pope J.H., Aufderheide T. P., Ruthazer R. et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department // N. Engl. J. Med. 2000. Vol. 342, No 16. P. 1163–1170.
7. Bagnenko S. F., Kuzhel’ A.M., Miroshnichenko A. G. et al. Pervye rezul’taty realizacii pilotnogo proekta «stacionarnoe otdelenie skoroj medicinskoj pomoshhi» v mnogoprofil’nom stacionare. Skoraja medicinskaja pomoshh’, 2016, No 3, pp. 71–76. (in Russ.).
8. Bhuiya F.A., Pitts S. R. Emergency department visits for chest pain and abdominal pain: United States, 1999– 2008 // NCHS Data Brief. 2010. Vol. 43. P. 1–8.
9. Hess E.P., Agarwal D., Chandra S. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the TIMI risk score in patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a meta-analysis // CMAJ. 2010. Vol. 182, No 10. P. 1039–1044.
10. Cullen L., Greenslade J. H., Hawkins T. et al. Improved Assessment of Chest pain Trial (IMPACT): assessing patients with possible acute coronary syndromes // Med. J. Aust. 2017. Vol. 207, No 5. P. 195–200.
11. Bagnenko S. F., Polushin Ju.S., Miroshnichenko A. G. et al. Organizacija raboty stacionarnogo otdelenija skoroj medicinskoj pomoshhi: metodicheskie rekomendacii. Moscow: GЕOTAR-Media, 2015. 80 p. (in Russ.).
12. Morrow D.A., Cannon C. P., Jesse R. L. et al. National academy of clinical biochemistry laboratory medicine practice guidelines: clinical characteristics and utilization of biochemical markers in acute coronary syndromes // Clinical Chemistry. 2007. Vol. 53. P. 552–574.
13. Mair J. High-sensitivity cardiac troponins in everyday clinical practice // World J. Cardiol. 2014. Vol. 6, No 4. P. 175–182.
14. Koroleva L. Ju., Golicyna N. A., Nosov V. P. et al. Vysokochuvstvitel’nyj troponin v diagnostike infarkta miokarda: real’naja diagnosticheskaja cennost’ ili pereocenennye vozmozhnosti? Medicinskij al’manah, 2017, Vol. 48, No 3, pp. 165–168. (in Russ.).
15. Bandstein N., Ljung R., Johansson M. Holzmann M. J. Undetectable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T level in the emergency department and risk of myocardial infarction // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014. Vol. 63, No 23. P. 2569–2578.
16. Poldervaart J.M., Langedijk M., Backus B. E. et al. Comparison of the GRACE, HEART and TIMI score to predict major adverse cardiac events in chest pain patients at the emergency department // Int. J. Cardiol. 2017. Vol. 227. P. 656–661.
17. Than M., Herbert M., Flaws D. et al. What is an acceptable risk of major adverse cardiac event in chest pain patients soon after discharge from the Emergency Department?: a clinical survey // Int. J. Cardiol. 2013. Vol. 166. P. 752–754.
18. Roos A., Bandstein N., Lundbäck M. et al. Stable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels and outcomes in patients with chest pain // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017. Vol. 70, No 18. P. 2226–2236.
19. Venturini J.M., Stake C. E., Cichon M. E. Prehospital point-of-care testing for troponin: are the results reliable? // Prehosp. Emerg. Care. 2013. Vol. 17, No 1. P. 88–91.
20. Plavunov N. F., Kadyshev V. A., Sokolov A. Ju. et al. Aprobacija testa «KardioBSZhK» v praktike skoroj medicinskoj pomoshhi pri differencial’noj diagnostike ostrogo koronarnogo sindroma. Skoraja medicinskaja pomoshh’, 2014, Vol. 15, No 4, pp. 31–36. (in Russ.).
21. Kokorin V. A. Rossijskij opyt kachestvennogo opredelenija soderzhanija serdechnogo belka, svjazyvajushhego zhirnye kisloty, dlja rannej diagnostiki infarkta miokarda. Farmateka, 2017, Vol. 345, No 10, pp. 39–44. (in Russ.).
22. Kalinichenko R. M., Kopylov F. Ju., Syrkin A. L. Vozmozhnosti kachestvennogo jekspress-testa na belok, svjazyvajushhij zhirnye kisloty, dlja rannej diagnostiki ostrogo koronarnogo sindroma na dogospital’nom jetape. Skoraja medicinskaja pomoshh’, 2013, No 1, pp. 14–18 (in Russ.).
23. Dupuy A.M., Cristol J. P., Kuster N. et al. Performances of the heart fatty acid protein assay for the rapid diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in ED patients // Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2015. Vol. 33, No 3. P. 326–330.
24. Viswanathan K., Kilcullen N., Morrell C. et al. Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein predicts long-term mortality and re-infarction in consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome who are troponinnegative // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010. Vol. 55, No 23. P. 2590–2598.
25. Vilela E.M., Bettencourt-Silva R., da Costa J. T. et al. Anti-cardiac troponin antibodies in clinical human disease: a systematic review // Ann. Transl. Med. 2017. Vol. 15, No 5. P. 307.
26. Jarohno N. N., Bol’shakova I.A., Balabushevich A. V. et al. Ocenka jeffektivnosti rannej stratifikacii riska s primeneniem serdechnogo belka, svjazyvajushhego zhirnye kisloty, u bol’nyh s podozreniem na ostryj koronarnyj sindrom bez pod#ema segmenta ST v uslovijah skoroj medicinskoj pomoshhi. Vrach skoroj pomoshhi, 2013, No 6, pp. 21–26 (in Russ.).
27. Shtegman O. A., Petrova M. M., Markov V. A. Rezul’taty obsuzhdenija problem ispol’zovanija markerov nekroza miokarda v ramkah rossijskogo nacional’nogo kongressa kardiologov (20–23 sentjabrja 2016 goda). Sibirskoe medicinskoe obozrenie, 2017, No 4, pp. 81–85 (in Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Shtegman O.A., Kharitonov A.A., Skripkin S.A., Krekov S.A. THE PROBLEMS OF INTERACTION BETWEEN PRE-HOSPITAL AND HOSPITAL STAGES WITH SUSPECTED ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME IN REAL LIFE. EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. 2018;19(2):21-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/2072-6716-2018-19-2-21-27