Preview

EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE

Advanced search

INFLUENCE OF FRAILTY SYNDROME ON THE COURSE OF NON-ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME AND OUTCOMES IN ELDERLY AND SENILE PATIENTS

https://doi.org/10.24884/2072-6716-2020-21-2-48-54

Abstract

Background. The incidence of non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) is especially high in elderly. In such patients, concomitant diseases are more common and there is a higher risk of complications, which emphasizes the relevance of the study of frailty syndrome and outcomes in NSTEACS. Objective. The aim of the study was to analyze the effect of frailty on the course of nonST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and outcomes in elderly and senile patients. Design and methods. 126 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome at the age of 61 to 90 were involved into the study. Follow-up was carried out during 1 year; clinical endpoints were mortality and recurrent acute coronary syndrome. All patients were divided into 3 groups according to the frailty index by M. Hoover et al.: the first group — 49 patients with frailty syndrome (38,9%), the second — 47 (37,3%) with pre-frailty and 30 patients (23,8%) without frailty. Results. Geriatric syndromes, cognitive impairment, depression, decreased basic and instrumental activity were more often in patients with frailty. They also had more complications, such as bleeding, arrhythmias and early post-infarction angina. During 1-year followup 5 patients with frailty (10.2%), 5 patients (10.6%) with pre-frailty, and 2 patients (6.6%) without frailty had adverse outcomes. When analyzing the influence of age and frailty on the development of adverse outcomes (death, repeated ACS), a higher contribution of age was revealed. Conclusion. Patients with ACS and frailty have a higher risk of adverse outcomes. Some of the reasons are various geriatric syndromes, changes in emotional and cognitive status and more frequent complications. Age and frailty were crucial for the development of adverse outcomes. However, senile age was of higher importance for the outcomes.

About the Authors

E. A. Lavrinova
North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

Evgenia A. Lavrinova

St. Petersburg



D. N. Bryliakova
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation

Daria N. Bryliakova

St. Petersburg



G. A. Kukharchik
North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov; Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation

Galina А. Kukharchik

St. Petersburg



References

1. Alegre O., Ariza-Solé A., Vidán M. T. et al. Impact of frailty and other geriatric syndromes on clinical management and outcomes in elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: rationale and design of the LONGEVO-SCA Registry // Clin. Cardiol. 2016. Vol. 39 (7). Р. 373–377.

2. Tonet E., Pavasini R., Biscaglia S. et al. Frailty in patients admitted to hospital for acute coronary syndrome: When, how and why? // J. Geriatr. Cardiol. 2019. Vol. 16 (2). Р. 129–137.

3. Flint K. Which came first, the frailty or the heart disease? Exploring the vicious cycle // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015. Vol. 65 (10). Р. 976–983.

4. Sergi G., Veronese N., Fontana L. et al. Pre-frailty and risk of cardiovascular disease in elderly men and women: The Pro.V.A. Study // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015. Vol. 65 (10). Р. 976–983.

5. Hoover M., Rotermann M., Sanmartin C., Bernier J. Validation of an index to estimate the prevalence of frailty among community-dwelling seniors // Heal. reports. 2013. Vol. 24 (9). Р. 10–17.

6. Folstein M. F., Folstein S. E., McHugh P.R. «Mini-mental state». A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician // J. Psychiatr. Res. 1975. Vol. 12 (3). Р. 189–198.

7. Sheikh J. I., Yesavage J. A. Geriatric depression scale (GDS) recent evidence and development of a shorter version // Clin. Gerontol. 1986. Vol. 5 (1–2). Р. 165–173.

8. Tkacheva O. N., Runikhina N. K., Ostapenko V. S. et al. Validation of the questionnaire for screening frailty. Advances in Gerontology, 2017, Vol. 30 (2), рр. 236–242 (In Russ.).

9. Mahoney F., Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the barthel index // Md. State Med. J. 1965. Vol. 14. Р. 61–65.

10. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Russian Journal of Cardiology, 2016, Vol. 3 (131), рр. 9–63 (In Russ.).

11. Soseliya N. N., Bagmanova N. K., Villevalde S. V. et al. Manifestations of frailty in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, 2018, Vol. 22 (2), рр. 141–147 (In Russ.).

12. Ponomareva I. P. Evaluaion of the syndrome of functional deficit in elderly wth non-oncological pathology. Kazan medical journal, 2017, No 6, рр. 906–909 (In Russ.).

13. Nigel Teo BSocSci (Hons), Qi Gao PhD, Ma Shwe Zin Nyunt PhD et al. Social Frailty and Functional Disability: Findings From the Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Studies // Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2017. Vol. 18 (7). 637.e13–637.e19.

14. Lisiak M., Uchmanowicz I., Wontor R. Frailty and quality of life in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome // Clin. Interv. Aging. 2016. Vol. 11. Р. 553–562.

15. Wołoszyn-Horák E, Salamon R, Chojnacka K et al. Frailty syndrome in daily practice of interventional cardiology ward-rationale and design of the FRAPICA trial: A STROBE-compliant prospective observational study // Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. Vol. 99 (5). e18935.

16. Hmel`niczkij A.V., Sedova E. V., Belousova O. N. Influence of frailty syndrome on results depending on the treatment strategy in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Modern problems of science and education, 2017, No 3, рр. 4 (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Lavrinova E.A., Bryliakova D.N., Kukharchik G.A. INFLUENCE OF FRAILTY SYNDROME ON THE COURSE OF NON-ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME AND OUTCOMES IN ELDERLY AND SENILE PATIENTS. EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. 2020;21(2):48-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/2072-6716-2020-21-2-48-54

Views: 668


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-6716 (Print)