THE EXPERIENCE OF APPLYING “LUCAS-2” DURING CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION PROVIDED BY THE EMS OF ST. PETERSBURG
https://doi.org/10.24884/2072-6716-2017-18-2-24-30
Abstract
This article presents the results of a retrospective research study on the outcomes of chest compressions through the traditional “manual” method and with the use of the electromechanical device LUCAS-2. The collected data did not provide us with evidence of a significant discrepancy in the results of two compared groups of patients; immediate that in certain situations encountered byEMS, it is not always possible to provide a patient with manual chest compressions, but conditions could make it possible to continue with the use of devices such as the “LUCAS-2”. These circumstances make it possible to recommend a wider usage of electromechanical devices such as the “LUCAS-2”in the EMS practice inSt. Petersburg.
About the Authors
A. G. Miroshnichenko
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
A. A. Boikov
Emergency Medical Service Station
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
A. L. Ershov
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
L. E. Elchinskaya
Emergency Medical Service Station
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
A. Ur. Churov
Emergency Medical Service Station
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
N. V. Petrova
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
D. V. Buzanov
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
A. E. Chikin
City Hospital № 17
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
References
1. Prinzing A., Eichhorn S., Deutsch M.-A. et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation using electrically driven devices: a review. J. Thorac. Dis., 2015, Vol. 10, No. 7, E459-E467.
2. Zheng Z. J., Croft J. B., Giles W. H., Mensah G.A. Sudden cardiac death in the United States, 1989 to 1998. Circulation, 2001, Vol. 104, No. 18, рр. 2158–2163
3. Perkins G.D., Jacobs I.G., Nadkarni V.M. et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update of the Utstein Resuscitation Registry Templates for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: a statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, Resuscitation Council of Asia); and the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation. Circulation, 2015, Vol. 132, No. 13 (Sept.), рр. 1286–1300.
4. Ewy G.A. The cardiocerebral resuscitation protocol for treatment of out-of-hospital primary cardiac arrest. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med., 2012, Vol. 15. Sept, рр. 20–65.
5. Pandian G. R., Thampi S. M., Chakraborty N. et al. Profile and outcome of sudden cardiac arrests in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital in South India. J. Emerg. Trauma Shock, 2016, Vol. 9, No. 4 (Oct-Dec), рр. 139–145.
6. Hawkes C., Booth S., Ji C., Brace-McDonnell S.J. et al. Epidemiology and outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in England. Resuscitation, 2017, Vol. 110. Jan, рр. 133–140.
7. Monsieurs K.G., Nolan J.P., Bossaert L.L. et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation, 2015, Vol. 95. Oct, рр. 1–80.
8. Kleinman M.E., Brennan E.E., Goldberger Z.D. et al. Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation, 2015, Vol. 132 (18 Suppl 2), No. 3 (Nov), рр. 414–435.
9. Naim M. Y., Sutton R. M., Friess S. H. et al. Blood Pressure – and Coronary Perfusion Pressure-Targeted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improves 24-Hour Survival From Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest. Crit. Care Med., 2016, Vol. 11, No. 11. e1111–e1117.
10. Мишина Т.П., Марусанов В.Е. Новые перспективы повышения качества сердечно-легочной реанимации на догоспитальном этапе // Скорая медицинская помощь. 2016. Т. 17, № 1. С. 41–49. [Mishina T. P., Marusanov V.E. Novye perspektivy povysheniya kachestva serdechno-legochnoj reanimacii na dogospitalnom etape. Skoraya medicinskaya pomoshh., 2016, Vol. 17, No. 1. рр. 41–49. (In Russ.)].
11. Gates S., Lall R., Quinn T. et al. Prehospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in outof-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised trial and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess., 2017. March, Vol. 21 (11), рр. 1–176.
12. Ong M.E., Mackey K.E., Zhang Z.C. et al. Mechanical CPR devices compared to manual CPR during out-ofhospital cardiac arrest and ambulance transport: a systematic review. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med., 2012. Jun, Vol. 18, рр., 20–39.
13. Li H., Wang D., Yu Y. et al. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med., 2016, No. 1 (Feb), Vol. 24, рр. 1–10.
14. Bonnes J.L., Brouwer M.A., Navarese E.P. et al. Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Versus CPR Including a Mechanical Chest Compression Device in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis From Randomized and Observational Studies. Ann. Emerg. Med., 2016, Vol. 67, No. 3, рр. 349–360.
Review
For citations:
Miroshnichenko A.G., Boikov A.A., Ershov A.L., Elchinskaya L.E., Churov A.U., Petrova N.V., Buzanov D.V., Chikin A.E. THE EXPERIENCE OF APPLYING “LUCAS-2” DURING CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION PROVIDED BY THE EMS OF ST. PETERSBURG. EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. 2017;18(2):24-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/2072-6716-2017-18-2-24-30
Views:
1171
Email this article 