The choice of the method of patients triage in the system of emergency medicine
https://doi.org/10.24884/2072-6716-2021-22-2-17-24
Abstract
For the timely provision of a full-fledged volume of emergency medical care, it is necessary to triage patients admitted to the emergency department. The article highlights the tool for the prompt and adequate prioritization of the growing number of patients for the provision of emergency medical care, corresponding to the features of the emergency medical care system in Uzbekistan, during which the opinions of experts working in the emergency medicine system were actively accepted.
About the Authors
L. T. Mirvarisova
WorldBank’s Improving of the emergency medical services project implementation unit
Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan
Lobar T. Mirvarisova
Tashkent
Kh. E. Anvarov
Republican Research Center of Emergency Medicine of the Health Ministry of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan
Khikmat E. Anvarov
Tashkent
References
1. Van Baar M. E., Giesen P., Grol R., Schrijvers A. J.P. Reporting results of a preliminary study to Emergency Medicine. Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care & Center for Quality of Care Research WOK, 2007.
2. Baumann M.R., Strout T. D. Triage of geriatric patients in the emergency department: validity and survival with the Emergency Severity Index // Ann. Emerg. Med. 2007. Vol. 49. рp. 234–240.
3. Ducharme J., Tanabe P., Homel P., Miner J. R., Chang A. K., Lee J. et al. The influence of triage systems and triage scores on timeliness of ED analgesic administration // Amer. J. Emerg. Med. 2008. Vol. 26. рp. 867–873.
4. Fosnocht D.E., Swanson E. R. Use of a triage pain protocol in the ED // Amer. J. Emerg. Med. 2007. Vol. 25. рp. 791–793.
5. Kim T.G., Cho J. K., Kim S. H., Lee H. S., Gu H. D., Chung S. W. Reliability and validity of the modified Emergency Severity Index-2 ad a triage tool // Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine. 2006. Vol. 17. рp. 154–164.
6. Mackway-J ones K. Emergency Triage. 2 ed. London: Manchester Triage Group, 2005.
7. Roukema J., Steyerberg E. W., van Meurs A., Ruige M., van der Lei J., Moll H. A. Validity of the Manchester Triage System in paediatric emergency care // Emerg. Med. J. 2006. Vol. 23. рp. 906–910.
8. Shavit I., Kofman M., Leder M., Hod T., Kozer E. Observational pain assessment versus self-report in paediatric triage // Emerg. Med. J. 2008. Vol. 25. рp. 552–555.
9. Singer A.J., Garra G., Chohan J. K., Dalmedo C., Thode Jr H. C. Triage pain scores and the desire for and use of analgesics // Ann. Emerg. Med. 2008. Vol. 52. рp. 689–695.
10. Worster A., Fernandes C. M., Eva K., Upadhye S. Predictive validity comparison of two five-level triage acuity scales // Eur. J. Emerg. Med. 2007. Vol. 14. рp. 188–192.
11. Van der Wulp I., Schrijvers A. J.P., van Stel H. F. Predicting admission and mortality with the Emergency Severity Index and the Manchester Triage System: a retrospective observational study // Emerg. Med. J. 2009. Vol. 26. рp. 506–509.
Review
For citations:
Mirvarisova L.T., Anvarov Kh.E. The choice of the method of patients triage in the system of emergency medicine. EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. 2021;22(2):17-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/2072-6716-2021-22-2-17-24
Views:
1510
Email this article 