Preview

EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE

Advanced search

ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSTICS IN THE WORK OF AN EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE (PROTOCOLS OF THE URGENT ULTRASOUND RESEARCH. PART II)

https://doi.org/10.24884/2072-6716-2019-0-3-68-74

Abstract

Diagnosis and primary care for unstable patients with hypotension and shock should be accurate and prompt. Ultrasound is ideal for assessing critically ill patients in a state of shock, it allows direct visualization of pathology and differentiation of shock conditions. Rapid Ultrasound in Shock (RUSH) meets the basic requirements of emergency medicine — speed, information content, safety, the ability to dynamically control. This bedside protocol demonstrates the speed and accuracy of determining the etiology of shock in the hands of an ambulance doctor. According to the RUSH protocol, three key physiological processes are evaluated, which are called: pump, reservoir and pipes, which allows a systematic approach to the study

About the Authors

T. P. Bulach
North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

Tamara P. Bulach,

St. Petersburg



I. V. Afanas’eva
North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

Irina V. Afanaseva  

St. Petersburg



References

1. Wongwaisayawan S., Suwannanon R., Prachanukool T. et al. Trauma Ultrasound // Ultrasound. Med. Biol. 2015. Vоl. 41, No 10. Р. 2543–2561.

2. https://www.aliem.com/2013/06/rush-protocol-rapid-ultrasound-shock-hypotension.

3. Peterson D., Arntfield R. T. Critical care ultrasonography // Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am. 2014. Vol. 32, No 4. Р. 907–926.

4. Mishina T. P. Sostojanie central’noj gemodinamiki pri hirurgicheskom lechenii vnepechenochnoj portal’noj gipertenzii u detej: аvtoreferat dis… doktora medicinskih nauk. Moscow, 2002, 48 р. (in Russ.).

5. Kodaka M. Cardiac Point-of-care Using Ultrasound // Masui. 2017. Vol. 66 (5). Р. 484–492.

6. Elbaih A.H., Housseini A. M., Khalifa M. E. Accuracy and outcome of rapid ultrasound in shock and hypotension (RUSH) in Egyptian polytrauma patients // Chin. J. Traumatol. 2018. No 3. Р. 156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.06.009. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

7. Keikha M., Salehi-Marzijarani M., Soldoozi Nejat R.et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Ultrasound in Shock (RUSH) Exam; A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis // Bull. Emerg. Trauma. 2018. No 4. Р. 271–278. doi: 10.29252/beat060402.

8. Stickles S.P., Carpenter C. R., Gekle R. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a point-of-care protocol for shock etiology: A systematic review and meta-analysis // CJEM. 2019. Jan 30. Р. 1–12. doi: 10.1017/cem.2018.498.

9. Bulach T. P., Petrova N. V., Izotova O. G., Afanas’eva I. V. Ul’trazvukovaya diagnostika v rabote vracha skoroj mdicinskoj poposhchi (рrotokoly urgentnogo ul’trazvukovogo issledovaniya. Chast’ 1). Skoraya medicinskaya pomoshch’, 2018, No 3, рр. 83–89 (in Russ.).

10. Expert Round Table on Ultrasound in ICU. International expert statement on training standards for critical care ultrasonography // Intensive Care Med. 2011. Vol. 37. Р. 1077–1083.

11. Milne J., Atkinson P., Lewis D., Fraser J. et al. Sonography in Hypotension and Cardiac Arrest (SHoC): Rates of Abnormal Findings in Undifferentiated Hypotension and During Cardiac Arrest as a Basis for Consensus on a Hierarchical Point of Care Protocol // Cureus. 2016. Vol. 8, No 4. e564. doi: 10.7759/cureus.564.

12. Estoos E., Nakitende D. Diagnostic Ultrasound Use In Undifferentiated Hypotension // Stat. Pearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL). Stat. Pearls Publishing, 2019. Feb. 19.

13. Killu K., Dalchevski S., Koba V. UZI v otdelenii intensivnoj terapii рerevod s angl. pod red. R. Е. Lahina. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo GЕOTAR-Media, 2016, 274 р. (in Russ.).

14. Razumovskij A. Yu., Mishina T. P., Stepanenko S. M., Rachkov V. Е., Fridlyand M. I. Central’naya gemodinamika pri hirurgicheskom lechenii detej s sindromom vnepechenochnoj portal’noj gipertenzii. Detskaya hirurgiya, 2001, No 2, рр. 26–32 (in Russ.).

15. Bagheri-Hariri S., Yekesadat M., Farahmand S. et al. The impact of using RUSH protocol for diagnosing the type of unknown shock in the emergency department // Emerg. Radiol. 2015. Vol. 22, No 5. Р. 517–520.

16. Perera P., Mailhot T., Riley D., Mandavia D. The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically lll. // Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am. 2010. Vol. 28, No 1. Р. 29–56, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2009.09.010.


Review

For citations:


Bulach T.P., Afanas’eva I.V. ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSTICS IN THE WORK OF AN EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE (PROTOCOLS OF THE URGENT ULTRASOUND RESEARCH. PART II). EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE. 2019;20(3):68-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/2072-6716-2019-0-3-68-74

Views: 866


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-6716 (Print)